First-Order Logic and Twin-Width for Some Geometric Graphs
Colin Geniet, Gunwoo Kim, Lucas Meijer

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between first-order logic tractability and twin-width in geometric graphs, establishing delineation results for certain classes and identifying cases where it fails.
Contribution
It extends the delineation characterization to new classes like axis-parallel unit segment graphs and circular arc graphs, and shows failure for visibility graphs of 1.5D terrains.
Findings
Delineation holds for intersection graphs of axis-parallel unit segments.
Delineation fails for visibility graphs of 1.5D terrains.
Delineation holds for intersection graphs of circular arcs.
Abstract
For some geometric graph classes, tractability of testing first-order formulas is precisely characterised by the graph parameter twin-width. This was first proved for interval graphs among others in [BCKKLT, IPEC '22], where the equivalence is called delineation, and more generally holds for circle graphs, rooted directed path graphs, and -graphs when is a forest. Delineation is based on the key idea that geometric graphs often admit natural vertex orderings, allowing to use the very rich theory of twin-width for ordered graphs. Answering two questions raised in their work, we prove that delineation holds for intersection graphs of non-degenerate axis-parallel unit segment graphs, but fails for visibility graphs of 1.5D terrains. We also prove delineation for intersection graphs of circular arcs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
