Heaven-Sent or Hell-Bent? Benchmarking the Intelligence and Defectiveness of LLM Hallucinations
Chengxu Yang, Jingling Yuan, Siqi Cai, Jiawei Jiang, Chuang Hu

TL;DR
This paper introduces HIC-Bench, a comprehensive evaluation framework for analyzing the dual nature of LLM hallucinations as both potentially creative and error-prone, across multiple scientific domains.
Contribution
It presents a novel structured assessment method that categorizes hallucinations into intelligent and defective types, enabling systematic study of their interplay in LLM creativity.
Findings
Nonlinear relationship between IH and DH
Creativity and correctness can be jointly optimized
LLM hallucinations can drive scientific innovation
Abstract
Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) are commonly regarded as errors to be minimized. However, recent perspectives suggest that some hallucinations may encode creative or epistemically valuable content, a dimension that remains underquantified in current literature. Existing hallucination detection methods primarily focus on factual consistency, struggling to handle heterogeneous scientific tasks and balance creativity with accuracy. To address these challenges, we propose HIC-Bench, a novel evaluation framework that categorizes hallucinations into Intelligent Hallucinations (IH) and Defective Hallucinations (DH), enabling systematic investigation of their interplay in LLM creativity. HIC-Bench features three core characteristics: (1) Structured IH/DH Assessment. using a multi-dimensional metric matrix integrating Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) metrics…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health via Writing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
