Uncertainty in security: managing cyber senescence
Martijn Dekker

TL;DR
The paper discusses how the aging and accumulation of uncertain security controls in cybersecurity create operational risks, likening this process to biological senescence, and emphasizes the need for pruning control frameworks to prevent system collapse.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of cyber senescence, highlighting the risks of control accumulation and uncertainty, and advocates for pruning security controls to mitigate aging in cyberspace.
Findings
Control overlap leads to increased uncertainty.
Accumulation of controls causes cybersecurity ecosystem aging.
Pruning controls can reduce operational risks.
Abstract
My main worry, and the core of my research, is that our cybersecurity ecosystem is slowly but surely aging and getting old and that aging is becoming an operational risk. This is happening not only because of growing complexity, but more importantly because of accumulation of controls and measures whose effectiveness are uncertain. I introduce a new term for this aging phenomenon: cyber senescence. I will begin my lecture with a short historical overview in which I sketch a development over time that led to this worry for the future of cybersecurity. It is this worry that determined my research agenda and its central theme of the role of uncertainty in cybersecurity. My worry is that waste is accumulating in cyberspace. This waste consists of a multitude of overlapping controls whose risk reductions are uncertain. Unless we start pruning these control frameworks, this waste accumulation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Information and Cyber Security · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
