Comparing next-generation detector configurations for high-redshift gravitational wave sources with neural posterior estimation
Filippo Santoliquido, Jacopo Tissino, Ulyana Dupletsa, Marica Branchesi, Jan Harms

TL;DR
This study evaluates various configurations of next-generation gravitational wave detectors for high-redshift black hole mergers using neural posterior estimation, highlighting differences in localization and distance measurement accuracy.
Contribution
First assessment of detector network configurations using neural posterior estimation for high-redshift gravitational wave sources, demonstrating its robustness and efficiency.
Findings
Neural posterior estimation accurately reproduces complex posteriors.
Misaligned L-shaped detectors have less precise distance estimates but better sky localization.
Adding Cosmic Explorer improves sky-position degeneracy reduction.
Abstract
The coming decade will be crucial for determining the final design and configuration of a global network of next-generation (XG) gravitational-wave detectors, including the Einstein Telescope (ET) and Cosmic Explorer (CE). In this study, and for the first time, we assessed the performance of various network configurations using neural posterior estimation (NPE) implemented in Dingo-IS-a method based on normalizing flows and importance sampling that enables fast and accurate inference. We focused on a specific science case involving short-duration, massive and high-redshift binary black hole mergers with detector-frame chirp masses . These systems encompass early-Universe stellar and primordial black holes, as well as intermediate-mass black hole binaries, for which XG observatories are expected to deliver major discoveries. Validation against standard Bayesian…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
