A Closer Look at Nat\'ario's Zero-Expansion Warp Drive

TL;DR

This paper provides a detailed analysis of Natário's zero-expansion warp drive spacetime, revealing its Petrov type, the significance of Weyl curvature, and comparing its physical viability to Alcubierre's model, ultimately questioning its practicality.

Contribution

It classifies Natário's warp drive as Petrov type I, analyzes curvature invariants including Weyl, visualizes physical quantities, and compares its curvature magnitude to Alcubierre's, challenging claims of its realism.

Findings

Natário's spacetime is Petrov type I.

Weyl curvature plays a significant role near the warp bubble.

Curvature invariants are 35 times larger than Alcubierre's, reducing viability.

Abstract

We conduct a detailed analysis of Nat'{a}rio's ``zero-expansion'' warp drive spacetime, focusing on scalar curvature invariants within the 3+1 formalism. This paper has four primary objectives: First, we establish the Petrov type classification of Nat'{a}rio's spacetime, which has not been previously determined in the literature. We prove that Nat'{a}rio's spacetime is Petrov type I, not fitting the Class B warped product spacetime definition. Second, we assess the relative magnitude of the Weyl scalar curvature invariant and compare it with the amplitudes of Einstein's scalar and the Ricci quadratic and cubic invariants within the warp-bubble zone. Previous studies have focused on Ricci curvature and the energy-momentum tensor, neglecting the Weyl curvature, which we demonstrate plays a significant role due to the sharp localization of the form function near the warp-bubble radius. Third, we visualize several curvature invariants for Nat'{a}rio's warp drive, as well as momentum density, which we show as the critical physical quantity governing the orientation of the warp drive trajectory, overshadowing space volume changes. Fourth, we critically examine claims that Nat'{a}rio's warp drive is more realistic than Alcubierre's. We demonstrate that Nat'{a}rio's spacetime exhibits curvature invariant amplitudes 35 times greater than Alcubierre's, given identical warp-bubble parameters, making Nat'{a}rio's concept even less viable. Additionally, we address Mattingly et al.'s analysis, highlighting their underestimation of curvature invariant amplitudes by 21 orders of magnitude.