Finding the best density functionals for water: benchmarking the forces
Shifan Cui

TL;DR
This study benchmarks over 50 density functionals for water to identify those providing the most accurate force calculations, crucial for reliable water simulations across various phases.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive benchmark of water force accuracy for a wide range of density functionals, highlighting the best performers and potential improvements.
Findings
B97M-V, ωB97M-V, and revDOD-PBEP86-D4 are the top functionals at different levels.
No satisfactory GGA functionals were found; a correction to BLYP-D4 improves its accuracy.
Force-based benchmarking offers better structural coverage and confidence than traditional methods.
Abstract
A DFT benchmark on water including more than 50 functionals from GGA to double-hybrid levels is reported. The main metric is the accuracy of forces, allowing better structural coverage, higher statistical confidence, and fewer error sources compared to conventional benchmarks. The input structures include water clusters of 4~128 molecules, with highly varied yet realistic configurations of water, ice, and their mixtures. The B97M-V, {\omega}B97M-V, and revDOD-PBEP86-D4 functionals are found to be best on the mGGA, hybrid, and double-hybrid levels, respectively. No satisfying GGA functionals are found, but it can be obtained by combining BLYP-D4 with a simple correction to O-H bonds, achieving accuracy comparable to B97M-V.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies · Crystallography and molecular interactions · Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
