Optical Follow-Up Strategies for the Next Neutrino-Detected Galactic Core-Collapse Supernova

TL;DR

This study evaluates the feasibility of optical follow-up observations for galactic core-collapse supernovae triggered by neutrino detections, demonstrating that both large and small telescopes can effectively identify EM counterparts.

Contribution

It models the spatial distribution of CCSNe and simulates follow-up strategies using different neutrino and optical observatories, optimizing detection plans for early supernova EM signals.

Findings

Both LSST and TAROT have comparable detection efficiencies.

TAROT requires fewer pointings to cover the localization area.

Neutrino follow-up campaigns can effectively detect supernova optical counterparts.

Abstract

Core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are expected to produce intense bursts of neutrinos preceding the emergence of their electromagnetic (EM) counterparts. The prompt detection of such neutrino signals offers a unique opportunity to trigger early follow-up observations in the EM domain. We aim to assess the feasibility and efficiency of an optical-NIR follow-up strategy for CCSNe discovered via neutrino bursts, by modelling the spatial distribution of events and simulating realistic observational campaigns taking into account the size of the localization error box generated by triangulating the neutrino burst. We modelled the Galactic distribution of CCSNe, including the effects of interstellar extinction, and considered three main progenitor types: Wolf-Rayet stars, red and blue supergiants. We included the shock breakout in the EM signatures that could be detected following the neutrino burst. A population of CCSNe was generated and detected by different networks of neutrino observatories, including IceCube, KM3NeT, Super-Kamiokande, Hyper-Kamiokande, and JUNO. The resulting skymaps were used as input for GWEMOPT to produce optimized follow-up plans with two optical facilities: LSST and the TAROT robotic telescopes. Both LSST and TAROT exhibit comparable detection efficiencies for the simulated CCSN population. However, the TAROT network achieves similar success rates while requiring fewer pointings to cover the CCSN skymap. Our simulations demonstrate that neutrino follow-up campaigns can effectively CCSN optical counterparts using both large and small facilities. Depending on the neutrino network, the median number of pointings for the two tested optical facilities is of the order of 20 to 100 to find the EM emission. The number of images is larger for LSST than for TAROT by a factor of 2 to 4.