Multimodal Bayesian Network for Robust Assessment of Casualties in Autonomous Triage
Szymon Rusiecki, Cecilia G. Morales, Kimberly Elenberg, Leonard Weiss, Artur Dubrawski

TL;DR
This paper introduces a rule-based Bayesian network for casualty assessment in mass casualty incidents, improving accuracy and coverage without needing training data, and demonstrating effectiveness in DARPA Triage Challenge scenarios.
Contribution
The work presents a novel expert-knowledge-guided probabilistic model that outperforms vision-only methods in emergency triage, supporting inference with incomplete data and noise.
Findings
Physiological assessment accuracy increased from 15% to 42% and 19% to 46%.
Overall triage accuracy improved from 14% to 53%.
Diagnostic coverage expanded from 31% to 95%.
Abstract
Mass Casualty Incidents can overwhelm emergency medical systems and resulting delays or errors in the assessment of casualties can lead to preventable deaths. We present a decision support framework that fuses outputs from multiple computer vision models, estimating signs of severe hemorrhage, respiratory distress, physical alertness, or visible trauma, into a Bayesian network constructed entirely from expert-defined rules. Unlike traditional data-driven models, our approach does not require training data, supports inference with incomplete information, and is robust to noisy or uncertain observations. We report performance for two missions involving 11 and 9 casualties, respectively, where our Bayesian network model substantially outperformed vision-only baselines during evaluation of our system in the DARPA Triage Challenge (DTC) field scenarios. The accuracy of physiological…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
