Hyperbolic Graph Embeddings: a Survey and an Evaluation on Anomaly Detection
Souhail Abdelmouaiz Sadat, Mohamed Yacine Touahria Miliani, Khadidja Hab El Hames, Hamida Seba, Mohammed Haddad

TL;DR
This paper surveys hyperbolic graph embedding models and evaluates their effectiveness in anomaly detection, showing they outperform Euclidean methods in capturing complex graph structures and providing an open-source library for future research.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive review of hyperbolic graph embedding models and evaluates their performance on anomaly detection tasks, highlighting their advantages over Euclidean approaches.
Findings
VAE achieved 94% F1-score on Elliptic dataset.
HGCAE scored 80% on Cora dataset.
Hyperbolic methods outperform Euclidean ones in complex anomaly detection.
Abstract
This survey reviews hyperbolic graph embedding models, and evaluate them on anomaly detection, highlighting their advantages over Euclidean methods in capturing complex structures. Evaluating models like \textit{HGCAE}, \textit{\(\mathcal{P}\)-VAE}, and \textit{HGCN} demonstrates high performance, with \textit{\(\mathcal{P}\)-VAE} achieving an F1-score of 94\% on the \textit{Elliptic} dataset and \textit{HGCAE} scoring 80\% on \textit{Cora}. In contrast, Euclidean methods like \textit{DOMINANT} and \textit{GraphSage} struggle with complex data. The study emphasizes the potential of hyperbolic spaces for improving anomaly detection, and provides an open-source library to foster further research in this field.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Graph Theory and Algorithms
