Reliable Audio Deepfake Detection in Variable Conditions via Quantum-Kernel SVMs

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that quantum-kernel SVMs improve the detection of audio deepfakes under variable conditions by reducing false positives and achieving lower error rates compared to classical SVMs, without increasing model complexity.

Contribution

It introduces the use of quantum kernels in SVMs for audio deepfake detection, showing improved accuracy and generalization over classical methods in diverse datasets.

Findings

Quantum-kernel SVMs achieve lower EERs across multiple datasets.

Quantum kernels reduce false positive rates significantly.

Results are consistent across cross-validation folds.

Abstract

Detecting synthetic speech is challenging when labeled data are scarce and recording conditions vary. Existing end-to-end deep models often overfit or fail to generalize, and while kernel methods can remain competitive, their performance heavily depends on the chosen kernel. Here, we show that using a quantum kernel in audio deepfake detection reduces falsepositive rates without increasing model size. Quantum feature maps embed data into high-dimensional Hilbert spaces, enabling the use of expressive similarity measures and compact classifiers. Building on this motivation, we compare quantum-kernel SVMs (QSVMs) with classical SVMs using identical mel-spectrogram preprocessing and stratified 5-fold cross-validation across four corpora (ASVspoof 2019 LA, ASVspoof 5 (2024), ADD23, and an In-the-Wild set). QSVMs achieve consistently lower equalerror rates (EER): 0.183 vs. 0.299 on ASVspoof 5 (2024), 0.081 vs. 0.188 on ADD23, 0.346 vs. 0.399 on ASVspoof 2019, and 0.355 vs. 0.413 In-the-Wild. At the EER operating point (where FPR equals FNR), these correspond to absolute false-positiverate reductions of 0.116 (38.8%), 0.107 (56.9%), 0.053 (13.3%), and 0.058 (14.0%), respectively. We also report how consistent the results are across cross-validation folds and margin-based measures of class separation, using identical settings for both models. The only modification is the kernel; the features and SVM remain unchanged, no additional trainable parameters are introduced, and the quantum kernel is computed on a conventional computer.