The Big Tradeoff averted: five avenues to promote efficiency and equality simultaneously
Ali Zeytoon-Nejad

TL;DR
This paper identifies five specific scenarios where the typical tradeoff between economic efficiency and income equality can be avoided, allowing societies to promote both goals simultaneously.
Contribution
It introduces five novel avenues to circumvent the traditional efficiency-equality tradeoff using formal economic models and discusses their policy implications.
Findings
Five avenues to avoid the efficiency-equality tradeoff
Development of static and dynamic economic models for each avenue
Policy recommendations for promoting both efficiency and equality
Abstract
Society as a whole faces a host of economic tradeoffs, many of which emerge around economic policies. An example of tradeoffs that any society faces in many economic realms is the tradeoff between economic efficiency and income equality (aka the efficiency-equality tradeoff). This tradeoff has been called "the Big Tradeoff" by the esteemed economist Arthur Okun, who also termed it "the Double Standard of a Capitalist Democracy." Although the efficiency-equality tradeoff is more or less an inevitable tradeoff in most societal settings and economic contexts, there are still some special circumstances in which this tradeoff can be avoided. This paper identifies five such avenues and elaborates on why and how the tradeoff between these two somewhat contradictory societal goals-efficiency and equality-can be deftly averted under the mentioned circumstances. These avenues with their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsUnemployment and Economic Growth · Economic Theory and Policy · Income, Poverty, and Inequality
