Why Most Optimism Bandit Algorithms Have the Same Regret Analysis: A Simple Unifying Theorem
Vikram Krishnamurthy

TL;DR
This paper reveals that many optimism-based stochastic bandit algorithms share a common regret analysis structure, providing a unifying theorem that simplifies understanding and extends to new variants.
Contribution
It introduces a simple unifying theorem that captures the core analysis of various optimism-based bandit algorithms, simplifying proofs and extending to new variants.
Findings
Unified regret analysis framework for optimism bandit algorithms
Simplified proofs for classical algorithms like UCB and GP-UCB
Extension of the framework to contemporary bandit variants
Abstract
Several optimism-based stochastic bandit algorithms -- including UCB, UCB-V, linear UCB, and finite-arm GP-UCB -- achieve logarithmic regret using proofs that, despite superficial differences, follow essentially the same structure. This note isolates the minimal ingredients behind these analyses: a single high-probability concentration condition on the estimators, after which logarithmic regret follows from two short deterministic lemmas describing radius collapse and optimism-forced deviations. The framework yields unified, near-minimal proofs for these classical algorithms and extends naturally to many contemporary bandit variants.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research · Risk and Portfolio Optimization · Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
