A Service Robot's Guide to Interacting with Busy Customers
Suraj Nukala, Meera Sushma, Leimin Tian, Akansel Cosgun, Dana Kulic

TL;DR
This study evaluates how different communication modalities of service robots affect attention and intention communication with busy customers in hospitality, revealing that speech captures attention well but visual cues clarify intentions more effectively.
Contribution
It provides empirical insights into the effectiveness of acoustic, visual, and micromotion modalities for communication in service robots during busy interactions.
Findings
Speech effectively captures attention.
Visual cues best communicate intention.
Micromotion is less effective for communication.
Abstract
The growing use of service robots in hospitality highlights the need to understand how to effectively communicate with pre-occupied customers. This study investigates the efficacy of commonly used communication modalities by service robots, namely, acoustic/speech, visual display, and micromotion gestures in capturing attention and communicating intention with a user in a simulated restaurant scenario. We conducted a two-part user study (N=24) using a Temi robot to simulate delivery tasks, with participants engaged in a typing game (MonkeyType) to emulate a state of busyness. The participants' engagement in the typing game is measured by words per minute (WPM) and typing accuracy. In Part 1, we compared non-verbal acoustic cue versus baseline conditions to assess attention capture during a single-cup delivery task. In Part 2, we evaluated the effectiveness of speech, visual display,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI · AI in Service Interactions · Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
