Riemannian Stochastic Interpolants for Amorphous Particle Systems
Louis Grenioux, Leonardo Galliano, Ludovic Berthier, Giulio Biroli, Marylou Gabri\'e

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Riemannian stochastic interpolation method for generating equilibrium configurations of amorphous materials, leveraging symmetry-aware neural networks to improve sampling efficiency and accuracy.
Contribution
It develops an equivariant Riemannian stochastic interpolation framework tailored for amorphous particle systems, addressing the challenge of sampling disordered materials.
Findings
Enhanced generative performance with symmetry constraints
Effective incorporation of periodic boundary conditions
Improved sampling of amorphous systems
Abstract
Modern generative models hold great promise for accelerating diverse tasks involving the simulation of physical systems, but they must be adapted to the specific constraints of each domain. Significant progress has been made for biomolecules and crystalline materials. Here, we address amorphous materials (glasses), which are disordered particle systems lacking atomic periodicity. Sampling equilibrium configurations of glass-forming materials is a notoriously slow and difficult task. This obstacle could be overcome by developing a generative framework capable of producing equilibrium configurations with well-defined likelihoods. In this work, we address this challenge by leveraging an equivariant Riemannian stochastic interpolation framework which combines Riemannian stochastic interpolant and equivariant flow matching. Our method rigorously incorporates periodic boundary conditions and…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
- The paper is well-presented. - The developed theoretical framework is arguably simple, but rigorous and thorough. The proofs seem sound and are well written. - The paper formalises and proves some intuitive claims (e.g., Prop. 9) – something often overlooked. - The empirical evidence clearly shows improvement on existing baselines on the provided experiment. Not being an expert in the field of the application, I cannot exactly judge of its quality, however; but the overall method seems to prod
- The novelty is arguably very low. This paper mostly applies equivariant architectures to Riemannian Flow Matching. In particular, the considered GNN is made Lipschitz-bounded and equivariant, which, as mentioned in the paper, has already been done numerous times. (Perhaps not all at once?) - Similarly, the theoretical framework does not seem particularly insightful; it mostly formalises results that intuitively seem self-evident. While it is good to prove these, it does not add anything new. A
- Figure 2 makes the equivariances quite convincing - Competing methods have drawbacks (Riemannian DDPM, no likelihood; maximum-likelihood training of ODE, expensive) - The reweighing is possible via the framework and it is shown to make a big improvement in performance.
- Figure 1, right side. The word "symmetrized" is written next to an image in which the symmetry is far from clear. What's going on there? - There is a lot of time spent on what I would consider background information. Many of these symmetries are closely discussed in other works. I agree that a specific treatment of stochastic interpolants is technically new, but the details discussed here are somewhat minor. - While the performance is obviously better with the author's treatment, the results a
1. The paper is well-structured and esay to follow. 2. The paper leverages the symmetry and geometry structure of the amorphous materials, which is reasonable,
1. Limited experimental scope. The experiments appear to be restricted to two-dimensional and relatively small-scale datasets. Additional experiments on larger-scale and real-world datasets would strengthen the paper’s contributions. Please refer to Question 1 for further details. 2. Lack of efficiency analysis. I noticed that the authors use Eq. (8) to compute the expectation of physical quantities. To the best of my knowledge, such likelihood computations can be inefficient and inaccurate. Ad
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Materials Science · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
