First-time assessment of glitch-induced bias and uncertainty in inference of extreme mass ratio inspirals
Amin Boumerdassi, Matthew C. Edwards, Avi Vajpeyi, Ollie Burke

TL;DR
This study assesses how transient glitches in LISA data affect the accuracy of parameter estimation for EMRIs, finding that moderate mitigation keeps biases minimal, but higher SNR glitches can cause significant biases.
Contribution
It provides the first quantitative analysis of glitch-induced biases in EMRI parameter inference for LISA, using simulated data and Fisher-matrix and MCMC methods.
Findings
Moderately mitigated glitches cause negligible biases in EMRI parameters.
High-SNR glitches can induce biases approaching 1 sigma.
EMRI inference is more robust to glitches than other sources like black hole binaries.
Abstract
This work investigates the impact of streams of transient, non-Gaussian noise artifacts or "glitches" on the parameter estimation of extreme mass ratio inspirals (EMRI) in the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). Glitches cause biased and less precise inference for short-duration signals such as massive black hole binaries, but their effect on long-lived sources such as EMRIs has not been quantified. Using simulated LISA observations containing injected EMRIs and streams of shapelet-based glitches drawn from the LISA Pathfinder catalog, we estimate the glitch-induced parameter biases and uncertainties through a Fisher-matrix-based analysis whose accuracy we verify with Markov-Chain Monte Carlo. We find that moderately mitigated glitch streams i.e. ones containing only glitches of up to moderate SNRs () induce negligible to minor biases $[\sim0.04\sigma…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
