Remarks on Fixed Point Assertions in Digital Topology, 11
Laurence Boxer

TL;DR
This paper critiques recent publications on fixed point assertions in digital topology, highlighting errors, trivialities, and incoherent statements in the field.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of existing literature, clarifying misconceptions and emphasizing the need for rigorous proofs in digital fixed point theory.
Findings
Identifies common errors in fixed point assertions
Highlights trivial or incoherent claims in digital topology
Calls for more rigorous proofs in the field
Abstract
The topic of fixed points in digital metric spaces has drawn yet more publications with assertions that are incorrect, incorrectly proven, trivial, or incoherently stated. We discuss publications with bad assertions concerning fixed points of self-functions on digital images, as in some of our previous papers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDigital Image Processing Techniques · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis · Cellular Automata and Applications
