Calibration Methods of Silicon Photomultiplier for JUNO-TAO Central Detector

TL;DR

This paper develops and evaluates calibration methods for Silicon Photomultipliers in the JUNO-TAO detector, ensuring high energy resolution and minimal bias in neutrino measurements.

Contribution

It introduces novel channel-level and tile-level calibration techniques for SiPM parameters, validated through simulations for the JUNO-TAO experiment.

Findings

Calibration biases are below 3% for PDE and IOCT.

Expected calibration biases are under 0.2 ns for time offset.

Calibration accuracy limits impact on vertex and energy resolution to below 3%.

Abstract

The Taishan Antineutrino Observatory (TAO or JUNO-TAO) is a satellite observatory for the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO), located 44 meters away from the No.1 reactor of the Taishan Nuclear Power Plant. TAO can measure the reactor antineutrino energy spectrum with excellent energy resolution (better than 2% at 1 MeV) using state-of-the-art Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPMs) operated at low temperature. To achieve this goal, the SiPMs (together with their readout electronics) must be well calibrated. This paper presents the channel-level calibration methods for the dark count rate (DCR), relative photon detection efficiency (PDE), time offset, gain, and internal optical crosstalk (IOCT) of the SiPMs based on charge and time information of the collected events. For the tile-level calibration of the external optical crosstalk (EOCT), in terms of its rate and emission angle distribution, a novel method is proposed by switching on and off different groups of SiPMs with an LED placed in the detector. Using one million simulated events, the expected calibration biases are evaluated for all the aforementioned parameters: relative PDE (~3%), IOCT (1.4%), DCR (0.4%), EOCT Rate (<0.1%), gain (<0.1%), time offset (<0.2 ns). The emission angle distribution of the EOCT photons could be measured with a bias of less than 4% in the main angular range. With the this calibration accuracy, the overall impacts of SiPM parameter uncertainties and calibration biases on vertex precision and energy resolution are limited, with relative degradation below 2% and 3%, respectively. It verifies the validity of the calibration method for the JUNO-TAO detector.