Label-consistent clustering for evolving data
Ameet Gadekar, Aristides Gionis, Thibault Marette

TL;DR
This paper introduces algorithms for evolving clustering solutions that balance minimizing clustering cost with maintaining consistency with previous solutions, specifically for the $k$-center problem, supported by theoretical and experimental results.
Contribution
It proposes two constant-factor approximation algorithms for label-consistent $k$-center clustering, addressing the challenge of evolving solutions with minimal changes.
Findings
Algorithms achieve constant-factor approximation guarantees.
Experimental results demonstrate effectiveness on real-world data.
Methods successfully balance clustering quality and solution stability.
Abstract
Data analysis often involves an iterative process, where solutions must be continuously refined in response to new data. Typically, as new data becomes available, an existing solution must be updated to incorporate the latest information. In addition to seeking a high-quality solution for the task at hand, it is also crucial to ensure consistency by minimizing drastic changes from previous solutions. Applying this approach across many iterations, ensures that the solution evolves gradually and smoothly. In this paper, we study the above problem in the context of clustering, specifically focusing on the -center problem. More precisely, we study the following problem: Given a set of points , parameters and , and a prior clustering solution for , our goal is to compute a new solution for , consisting of centers, which minimizes the clustering cost while…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
This paper introduces the problem of label-consistent k-clustering, a novel clustering formulation that aims to optimize clustering cost while ensuring a consistency constraint, in the form of a maximum number of data point re-labelings, from a historical clustering. Meanwhile, it presents two constant-factor approximation algorithms for the k-center variant of the proposed problem.
1. The innovation is insufficient. The label consistency constraint of historical cluster H is highly similar to the existing "elastic clustering" model, which lacks fundamental innovation and is more like an incremental adjustment of the existing model for a specific scenario. 2. The core theory and approximation algorithm in the paper are only for the k-center objective function, but the k-median and k-mean are more practical in the evolutionary data scenarios mentioned by the authors. This l
1. The formulation captures an important setting in incremental or evolving data analysis, where stability across time steps is crucial for interpretability and system reliability. 2. The paper offers both provable guarantees and empirical validation, which strengthens its technical completeness.
1. While the introduction and experiments emphasize the incremental or evolving nature of the data (e.g., extending a historical clustering to a new dataset at time $t$), the formal definition (Definition 3) treats the instance as a static dataset $𝑋$. It would improve clarity if the authors explicitly defined how the dataset evolves, e.g., distinguishing between existing and newly arrived points, and how the label consistency constraint applies in that setting. 2. In the problem definition, th
- The paper presents algorithms that are theoretically neat and simple and give provable guarantees. - The paper is generally written well and easy to read and follow. - The experiments show that (a modified version of) their algorithms are better than the baselines.
- As I can see, there are two ways of asking for recourse bounds in the setting of evolving data: One is the method taken here, which is to consider the case where there already exists a historical solution (which does not arise from the algorithm itself). Another, which I've personally seen more of, is to ask that the algorithm maintains a good approximation to the overall best solution, but with low recourse. In the latter setting, the guarantee is measured with respect to all clusterings inst
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Clustering Algorithms Research · Facility Location and Emergency Management · Face and Expression Recognition
