Neural Modular Physics for Elastic Simulation
Yifei Li, Haixu Wu, Zeyi Xu, Tuur Stuyck, Wojciech Matusik

TL;DR
Neural Modular Physics (NMP) introduces a modular neural approach to elastic simulation, combining neural approximation with physical interpretability, leading to improved generalization, stability, and physical property preservation over traditional monolithic neural models.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel modular neural framework for elastic simulation that enhances physical consistency and generalization by decomposing dynamics into meaningful neural modules.
Findings
NMP outperforms monolithic neural models in generalization and stability.
NMP better preserves physical properties during simulation.
NMP demonstrates robustness in scenarios with unknown dynamics.
Abstract
Learning-based methods have made significant progress in physics simulation, typically approximating dynamics with a monolithic end-to-end optimized neural network. Although these models offer an effective way to simulation, they may lose essential features compared to traditional numerical simulators, such as physical interpretability and reliability. Drawing inspiration from classical simulators that operate in a modular fashion, this paper presents Neural Modular Physics (NMP) for elastic simulation, which combines the approximation capacity of neural networks with the physical reliability of traditional simulators. Beyond the previous monolithic learning paradigm, NMP enables direct supervision of intermediate quantities and physical constraints by decomposing elastic dynamics into physically meaningful neural modules connected through intermediate physical quantities. With a…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. This paper is easy to follow and well organized. 2. This paper evaluates their method from multiple aspects: 1. Comparison with neural operator based baselines. 2. Joint training versus separate training. 3. Comparison with physics simulator. 4. Inference by combining with traditional simulators. 5. Comparison with no direct physical constraint included.
1. The biggest weakness is that the proposed method is just substituting the immediate two steps that are done by traditional methods with data-driven methods. Thus, novelty is the biggest issue to me. Besides, the neural constitutive step is following the existing paper. 2. Another contribution claimed by the authors is the separate training plus joint training. From what I understand, this training method was also proposed in the existing work to solve the “collapse” issue, which is also not n
- The overall presentation is clear.
- The framework seems just a replication of some groundtruth FEM simulation method. In separate trainings for each module, it seems that the groundtruth constitutive model law and the groundtruth time integration are both available. The two groundtruth pieces are basically all you need to implement the whole simulation in the traditional way. I am concerned about the motivation of the method: if you need to implement the whole traditional pipeline to get groundtruth, why bother replacing modules
- The experiments provide good empirical evidence that their NMF model has better long term rollout performance for both seen and unseen scenarios in comparison to the baselines. - Their NMF model allows the addition of soft physics constraints in a fairly straightforward way. - The paper provides a thorough explanation of their modular model design and reasoning.
- The architecture is specialized for elastic physics, which will not generalize to other equations and setttings. However, I acknowledge the idea of replacing components of a simulator with neural modules is an interesting idea. - The paper proposes a way to replace parts of an FEM method with neural networks, but this is not straightforward to apply to other types of solver schemes such as finite difference methods and spectral methods. - The strain-displacement matrix is required a priori to
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModel Reduction and Neural Networks · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
