A study of cut-elimination for a non-labelled cyclic proof system for propositional dynamic logics
Yukihiro Oda

TL;DR
This paper introduces a cyclic proof system for an extension of propositional dynamic logic with backwards modal operators, analyzing its properties and limitations regarding cut-elimination.
Contribution
It presents a new sequent calculus and cyclic proof system for extended propositional dynamic logic, with proofs of soundness, completeness, and cut-elimination restrictions.
Findings
Soundness and completeness established for the systems
Cut-elimination fails in the general cyclic proof system
Cut-elimination holds under certain restrictions
Abstract
Dynamic logic is a modal logic for reasoning about programs. A cyclic proof system is a proof system that allows proofs containing cycles and is an alternative to a proof system containing (co-)induction. This paper introduces a sequent calculus and a non-labelled cyclic proof system for an extension of propositional dynamic logic obtained by adding backwards modal operators. We prove the soundness and completeness of these systems and show that cut-elimination fails in both. Moreover, we show the cut-elimination property of the cyclic proof system for propositional dynamic logic obtained by restricting ours.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Logic, programming, and type systems · Formal Methods in Verification
