Predicting Forecast Error for the HRRR Using LSTM Neural Networks: A Comparative Study Using New York and Oklahoma State Mesonets
David Aaron Evans, Kara J. Sulia, Nick P. Bassill, Chris D. Thorncroft, Jay C. Rothenberger, Lauriana C. Gaudet

TL;DR
This study employs LSTM neural networks to predict forecast errors of the HRRR model using mesonet data, significantly improving precipitation, wind, and temperature forecast accuracy for real-time weather decision support.
Contribution
It introduces a novel application of LSTM models for real-time, location-specific forecast error prediction using dense mesonet observations, enhancing operational weather forecasting.
Findings
LSTMs improve precipitation forecast error prediction by 48% on average.
Wind error predictions are improved by 15%, with consistent over- and underforecast accuracy.
Temperature error predictions are relatively accurate but smoother than observations.
Abstract
Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models are trained to predict forecast errors for the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model using the New York State Mesonet and Oklahoma State Mesonet near-surface weather observations as ground truth. When evaluated using mean-absolute-error and percent improvement relative to the HRRR, LSTMs predict precipitation error most accurately, providing, on average, a 48% improvement relative to the HRRR forecast, followed by wind error, providing, on average, a 15% improvement, and then temperature error, providing, on average, a 25% improvement. Precipitation errors exhibit an asymmetry, with overforecast precipitation detected more accurately than underforecast, while wind error predictions are consistent across over- and underforecast predictions. Temperature error predictions are relatively accurate but smoother, with respect to variance, than true…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
