QUIJOTE-TFGI polarization calibration -- Ground characterization and on-sky validation with Tau A and the Moon

TL;DR

This paper presents ground and on-sky calibration and validation of the QUIJOTE TFGI instrument at 30-40 GHz, including polarization calibration, stability analysis, and ground-based characterization using Tau A and the Moon.

Contribution

It introduces a comprehensive calibration approach combining ground reference signals with on-sky observations to validate polarization and responsivity stability.

Findings

Calibration with a reference diode resolves instrument angle degeneracies.

On-sky observations of Tau A and the Moon validate calibration accuracy.

Responsivity shows potential variations over time, but relative stability between channels is maintained.

Abstract

Our objective is to characterize the QUIJOTE Thirty and Forty GHz instrument (TFGI), calibrate it with a reference calibration signal on the ground, compare our results with on-sky calibration based on bright sources, and study the stability of the calibration parameters over time. First, from the ground, we fit the data using a reference calibration signal (a diode) introduced to resolve degeneracies among the various instrument angles. Finally, we utilize on-sky observations of Tau A and the Moon to validate the results. By creating calibration datasets obtained with the reference diode, we evaluate the data quality and quantify phase switch errors to account for the fine polarization response. We also utilize Tau A and Moon observations to calibrate the system's response and stability over time. In addition, we calculate the refraction index of the Moon to be $n_{Moon}$ = 1.209 $\pm$ 0.007 (stat) $\pm$ 0.005 (sys) at 31 GHz under smooth-surface assumption. The results from fitting the instrument phase-switch error angle align with 0 deg at 2$\sigma$ precision, indicating that no further correction is required within a few percent precision. The calibrations with astrophysical sources (Tau A and the Moon) yield consistent results that constrain the polarization angle and responsivity. The polarization efficiency aligns well with ground measurements and the Tau A characterization, whereas the Moon-based calibration is more affected by systematics. We find hints of responsivity variations over time, although the relative responsivity between channels is found to remain stable. In the future, we conclude that installing a live calibrator will enhance performance by continuously monitoring responsivity and, in turn, improving the mitigation of systematic effects.