The chemical DNA of the Magellanic Clouds V. R-process dominates neutron capture elements production in the oldest SMC stars
Lorenzo Santarelli, Marco Palla, Alessio Mucciarelli, Lorenzo Monaco, Deimer Antonio Alvarez Garay, Donatella Romano, Carmela Lardo

TL;DR
This study analyzes the oldest stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud, revealing that r-process nucleosynthesis dominates neutron-capture element production, with significant star-to-star scatter indicating stochastic enrichment processes.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed chemical abundance analysis of the oldest SMC stars, highlighting the dominance of r-process elements and the stochastic nature of early chemical enrichment.
Findings
r-process dominates neutron-capture element production in old SMC stars
Significant star-to-star scatter in neutron-capture element abundances
Evidence of stochastic chemical evolution in the early SMC
Abstract
We present the chemical abundances of Fe, alpha- and neutron-capture elements in 12 metal-poor Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) giant stars, observed with the high-resolution spectrographs UVES/VLT and MIKE/Magellan. These stars have [Fe/H] between -2.3 and -1.4 dex, 10 of them with [Fe/H]<-1.8 dex. According to theoretical age-metallicity relations for this galaxy, these stars formed in the first Gyr of life of the SMC and represent the oldest SMC stars known so far. [alpha/Fe] abundance ratios are enhanced but at a lower level than MW metal-poor stars, as expected according to the slow star formation rate of the SMC. The sample exhibits a large star-to-star scatter in all the neutron-capture elements. The two r-process elements measured in this work (Eu and Sm) have abundance ratios from solar up to +1 dex, three of them with [Eu/Fe]>+0.7 dex and labeled as r-II stars. This [r/Fe]…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
