Homomorphism Indistinguishability, Multiplicity Automata Equivalence, and Polynomial Identity Testing

TL;DR

This paper investigates the computational complexity of homomorphism indistinguishability problems over certain graph classes, establishing conditional optimality results and connecting these problems to automata equivalence and polynomial identity testing.

Contribution

It proves that the known polynomial-time algorithm for bounded treewidth classes is conditionally optimal and improves complexity bounds for bounded pathwidth classes, linking these problems to automata and polynomial identity testing.

Findings

HomInd over bounded treewidth classes is conditionally optimal.

HomInd over bounded pathwidth classes is in C_=L and this bound is tight.

Multiplicity automata equivalence is C_=L-complete.

Abstract

Two graphs $G$ and $H$ are homomorphism indistinguishable over a graph class $\mathcal{F}$ if they admit the same number of homomorphisms from every graph $F \in \mathcal{F}$. Many graph isomorphism relaxations such as (quantum) isomorphism and cospectrality can be characterised as homomorphism indistinguishability over specific graph classes. Thereby, the problems $\textrm{HomInd}(\mathcal{F})$ of deciding homomorphism indistinguishability over $\mathcal{F}$ subsume diverse graph isomorphism relaxations whose complexities range from logspace to undecidable. Establishing the first general result on the complexity of $\textrm{HomInd}(\mathcal{F})$, Seppelt (MFCS 2024) showed that $\textrm{HomInd}(\mathcal{F})$ is in randomised polynomial time for every graph class $\mathcal{F}$ of bounded treewidth that can be defined in counting monadic second-order logic $\mathsf{CMSO}_2$. We show that this algorithm is conditionally optimal, i.e. it cannot be derandomised unless polynomial identity testing is in $\mathsf{PTIME}$. For $\mathsf{CMSO}_2$-definable graph classes $\mathcal{F}$ of bounded pathwidth, we improve the previous complexity upper bound for $\textrm{HomInd}(\mathcal{F})$ from $\mathsf{PTIME}$ to $\mathsf{C}_=\mathsf{L}$ and show that this is tight. Secondarily, we establish a connection between homomorphism indistinguishability and multiplicity automata equivalence which allows us to pinpoint the complexity of the latter problem as $\mathsf{C}_=\mathsf{L}$-complete.