Are Large Language Models Really Effective for Training-Free Cold-Start Recommendation?
Genki Kusano, Kenya Abe, Kunihiro Takeoka

TL;DR
This paper systematically compares large language models and text embedding models for training-free cold-start recommendation, finding that TEMs outperform LLMs in various settings, challenging common assumptions.
Contribution
First controlled experiments directly compare LLMs and TEMs for training-free recommendation, revealing TEMs' superior performance and scalability.
Findings
TEMs outperform LLMs in cold-start scenarios
TEM-based methods are more scalable for training-free recommendation
LLMs are not the only viable option for training-free ranking
Abstract
Recommender systems usually rely on large-scale interaction data to learn from users' past behaviors and make accurate predictions. However, real-world applications often face situations where no training data is available, such as when launching new services or handling entirely new users. In such cases, conventional approaches cannot be applied. This study focuses on training-free recommendation, where no task-specific training is performed, and particularly on \textit{training-free cold-start recommendation} (TFCSR), the more challenging case where the target user has no interactions. Large language models (LLMs) have recently been explored as a promising solution, and numerous studies have been proposed. As the ability of text embedding models (TEMs) increases, they are increasingly recognized as applicable to training-free recommendation, but no prior work has directly compared…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRecommender Systems and Techniques · Topic Modeling · Advanced Graph Neural Networks
