On braided simple extensions and braided non-semisimple near-group categories
Daniel Sebbag

TL;DR
This paper classifies non-degenerate braided non-semisimple near-group categories as simple extensions of specific representation categories, revealing their structure and how they arise from extensions involving symmetric subcategories.
Contribution
It provides a classification of braided non-semisimple near-group categories as extensions of certain representation categories, expanding understanding of their structure and origins.
Findings
Every non-degenerate braided non-semisimple near-group category is a simple extension of Rep(W W*) with non-trivial braiding.
Such categories can be constructed as extensions of these base categories by Rep(G), where G is the Picard group.
The categories are characterized by a unique simple projective object and a Lagrangian subcategory.
Abstract
We study simple extensions of pointed finite tensor categories, that is, tensor categories admitting an abelian decomposition where is a pointed tensor subcategory and has a unique simple projective object. Such categories provide a natural generalization of near-group categories. Our results concern the braided case. We prove that every non-degenerate braided non-semisimple near-group category is a braided simple extension of with non-trivial braiding for which is Lagrangian. Moreover, any braided non-semisimple near-group category arises canonically as an extension of such a category by , where is the Picard group of a symmetric subcategory determined by the unique simple projective object of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Finite Group Theory Research
