Optimising for the long game: methodological challenges in energy system optimisation pathways
Ivan Ruiz Manuel, Meijun Chen, Francesco Lombardi, Stefan Pfenninger-Lee

TL;DR
This paper reviews methodological challenges in energy system optimisation pathways, focusing on model foresight, biases, resolution trade-offs, and investment dynamics over decades.
Contribution
It systematically analyzes how modelling choices affect long-term energy pathway results and offers recommendations for improving model formulation and communication.
Findings
Identifies biases from end effects and foresight choices.
Highlights trade-offs between model resolution and long-term planning.
Provides guidelines to improve model transparency and accuracy.
Abstract
Pathways that describe the optimal evolution of energy systems across multiple decades are important in energy system research and policy literature, with net-zero and similar climate policies being common drivers behind them. While there are many studies on aspects such as spatial and operational resolution, model features, and model transparency, there has been little attention on the methodological considerations of formulating pathway studies in mathematical optimisation terms, and how these methods have evolved over time. To address this, we conduct a systematic review of optimal pathway literature at or above national level focusing on the following: i) the implications of model foresight choices, ii) end effects and related issues that may bias model outcomes, iii) trade-offs in model resolution, and iv) investment dynamics. We showcase how modellers have dealt with these aspects…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
