Irreducible groups and ergodicity in the boundary
Subhadip dey, Sebastian Hurtado

TL;DR
This paper investigates the structure of discrete subgroups in semi-simple Lie groups, showing ergodic actions prevent certain free product decompositions and relate algebraic properties to boundary actions.
Contribution
It establishes that ergodic actions on the Furstenberg boundary impose restrictions on subgroup decompositions and algebraic entries, extending to specific cases like SL(2,R)×SL(2,R).
Findings
Ergodic subgroups cannot be free products with Z.
Subgroups with algebraic entries preserve algebraic properties.
Certain irreducible groups in SL(2,R)×SL(2,R) cannot be free or hyperbolic.
Abstract
We show that if is a real semi-simple Lie group, and is a discrete subgroup of containing a subgroup acting ergodically (in a strong sense) on the Furstenberg boundary of , then is not isomorphic to a free product of with . Moreover, if has algebraic entries, then has algebraic entries as well. As a consequence, we show that if all irreducible discrete subgroups of act ergodically on , such groups cannot be free groups (or even Gromov hyperbolic). In the appendix, we discuss a connection between the existence of discrete irreducible groups and diophantine properties of Lie groups.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Advanced Operator Algebra Research · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
