Binarity at LOw Metallicity (BLOeM): Projected rotational velocities
D. J. Lennon, S. R. Berlanas, A. Herrero, N. Britavskiy, P. L. Dufton, N. Langer, H. Jin, A. Schootemeijer, A. Menon, J. Bestenlehner, P. Crowther, J. S. Vink, J. Bodensteiner, T. Shenar, K. Deshmukh, J. Villasenor, L. Patrick, F. Najarro, A. de Koter, L. Mahy, D. M. Bowman

TL;DR
The BLOeM survey studies rotational velocities of massive stars in the SMC, revealing distinct velocity distributions linked to stellar evolution stages, binary status, and potential merger history, with implications for understanding stellar rotation and binarity at low metallicity.
Contribution
This paper presents the first comprehensive analysis of projected rotational velocities for a large sample of massive stars in the SMC, linking rotation to binarity and evolutionary stage.
Findings
Main sequence stars show a broad vsini distribution with a peak at 30-60 km/s.
SB2 systems are mostly short period binaries with higher vsini around 140 km/s.
Supergiants generally have low vsini, indicating slow rotation or unresolved spectra.
Abstract
The Binarity at LOw Metallicity (BLOeM) survey is an ESO large programme designed to obtain multi-epoch spectroscopy for 929 massive stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). It will provide binary fractions and orbital configurations of binary systems, and search for dormant black-hole binary candidates (OB+BH). Here we present projected rotational velocities (vsini) of all sources and, using the multiplicity properties presented in previous papers, we derive the vsini distributions of apparent single stars, single lined spectroscopic (SB1) binaries, and SB2 systems. We identify a locus in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram where rotational velocities decrease significantly; we interpret this feature as broadly corresponding to the terminal-age main sequence. The main sequence cohort is distinguished by a broad range of vsini values, but with a strong peak in the distribution in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
