Proximal Causal Inference for Modified Treatment Policies
Antonio Olivas-Martinez, Peter B. Gilbert, Andrea Rotnitzky

TL;DR
This paper extends proximal causal inference to estimate effects of modified treatment regimes with unmeasured confounding, using machine learning techniques, demonstrated in COVID-19 vaccine studies.
Contribution
It introduces a new method for identifying and estimating causal effects under modified treatments without requiring all confounders to be measured.
Findings
Method successfully estimates effects in simulated data.
Applied to COVID-19 vaccine study data.
Performs well with finite samples in simulations.
Abstract
The proximal causal inference framework enables the identification and estimation of causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding by leveraging two disjoint sets of observed strong proxies: negative control treatments and negative control outcomes. In the point exposure setting, this framework has primarily been applied to estimands comparing counterfactual outcomes under a static fixed intervention or, possibly randomized, regime that depends on baseline covariates. For continuous exposures, alternative hypothetical scenarios can enrich our understanding of causal effects, such as those where each individual receives their observed treatment dose modified in a pre-specified manner - commonly referred to as modified treatment regimes. In this work, we extend the proximal causal inference framework to identify and estimate the mean outcome under a modified treatment regime,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
