Not All Factors Crowd Equally: Modeling, Measuring, and Trading on Alpha Decay
Chorok Lee

TL;DR
This paper introduces a hyperbolic decay model for factor alpha decay derived from game theory, validating it with empirical data, and explores how crowding affects factor performance and crash risk over time.
Contribution
It develops a novel hyperbolic decay model for factor alpha, tests it against alternatives, and links crowding dynamics to risk and performance in factor investing.
Findings
Hyperbolic decay fits momentum factors well (R^2=0.65).
Crowding accelerates after 2015 and predicts crash risk.
Crowding-based selection does not generate excess alpha.
Abstract
We derive a specific functional form for factor alpha decay -- hyperbolic decay alpha(t) = K/(1+lambda*t) -- from a game-theoretic equilibrium model, and test it against linear and exponential alternatives. Using eight Fama-French factors (1963--2024), we find: (1) Hyperbolic decay fits mechanical factors. Momentum exhibits clear hyperbolic decay (R^2 = 0.65), outperforming linear (0.51) and exponential (0.61) baselines -- validating the equilibrium foundation. (2) Not all factors crowd equally. Mechanical factors (momentum, reversal) fit the model; judgment-based factors (value, quality) do not -- consistent with a signal-ambiguity taxonomy paralleling Hua and Sun's "barriers to entry." (3) Crowding accelerated post-2015. Out-of-sample, the model over-predicts remaining alpha (0.30 vs. 0.15), correlating with factor ETF growth (rho = -0.63). (4) Average returns are efficiently priced.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Financial Markets and Investment Strategies · Sports Analytics and Performance
