Bell, Spinors, and the Impossibility of a Classical Spin-Vector Model
G.A. Koroteev

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the algebraic structure of quantum spin-rac{1}{2} particles cannot be represented within classical probability models, highlighting the fundamental incompatibility underlying Bell's theorem.
Contribution
It provides an algebraic proof that the noncommutative spinor algebra cannot be embedded into a classical Kolmogorov probability space while preserving key quantum correlations.
Findings
No classical Kolmogorov model reproduces quantum spin correlations.
The algebraic mismatch explains the Bell contradiction.
Explicit realization within the Quantum Index Algebra framework.
Abstract
We revisit the Bell--CHSH scenario for two spin-\(\tfrac{1}{2}\) particles and isolate the precise algebraic origin of the Bell contradiction. On the quantum side, spin-\(\tfrac{1}{2}\) is described by a noncommutative spinor (Clifford) algebra acting on the Hilbert space of two spin-\(\tfrac{1}{2}\) particles, with the singlet state yielding the usual correlation \(E(a,b) = -\,a\cdot b\) and Tsirelson's bound \(2\sqrt{2}\). On the classical side, the standard Bell assumptions amount to describing all measurement outcomes as \(\{\pm1\}\)-valued random variables on a single Kolmogorov probability space, i.e.\ elements of a commutative algebra \(\mathcal{C}(\Lambda)\). We show that there is no representation of the spinor algebra of spin-\(\tfrac{1}{2}\) (with its singlet state and locality structure) into any such commutative Kolmogorov algebra that preserves the \(\{\pm1\}\) spectra…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Advanced Operator Algebra Research · Algebraic and Geometric Analysis
