Leveraging LLMs for Title and Abstract Screening for Systematic Review: A Cost-Effective Dynamic Few-Shot Learning Approach
Yun-Chung Liu, Rui Yang, Jonathan Chong Kai Liew, Ziran Yin, Henry Foote, Christopher J. Lindsell, Chuan Hong

TL;DR
This paper introduces a two-stage dynamic few-shot learning method utilizing large language models to improve the efficiency and accuracy of title and abstract screening in systematic reviews, significantly reducing manual effort and costs.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel two-stage approach that combines low-cost and high-performance LLMs for cost-effective, accurate screening in systematic reviews.
Findings
Reduces manual screening effort by up to 50%
Demonstrates strong generalizability across 10 reviews
Achieves cost savings while maintaining high accuracy
Abstract
Systematic reviews are a key component of evidence-based medicine, playing a critical role in synthesizing existing research evidence and guiding clinical decisions. However, with the rapid growth of research publications, conducting systematic reviews has become increasingly burdensome, with title and abstract screening being one of the most time-consuming and resource-intensive steps. To mitigate this issue, we designed a two-stage dynamic few-shot learning (DFSL) approach aimed at improving the efficiency and performance of large language models (LLMs) in the title and abstract screening task. Specifically, this approach first uses a low-cost LLM for initial screening, then re-evaluates low-confidence instances using a high-performance LLM, thereby enhancing screening performance while controlling computational costs. We evaluated this approach across 10 systematic reviews, and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Topic Modeling
