Field Reconstruction for High-Frequency Electromagnetic Exposure Assessment Based on Deep Learning

TL;DR

This paper introduces a hybrid deep learning and electromagnetic algorithm framework to accurately reconstruct high-frequency electromagnetic fields for 5G exposure assessment, addressing public health concerns.

Contribution

It presents a novel hybrid reconstruction method combining classical algorithms with neural networks for improved accuracy in high-frequency electromagnetic exposure evaluation.

Findings

Achieved an average relative error of 4.57% in electric field reconstruction.

Achieved an average relative error of 2.97% in incident power density estimation.

Demonstrated robustness against measurement uncertainties and practical factors.

Abstract

Fifth-generation (5G) communication systems, operating in higher frequency bands from 3 to 300 GHz, provide unprecedented bandwidth to enable ultra-high data rates and low-latency services. However, the use of millimeter-wave frequencies raises public health concerns regarding prolonged electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure. Above 6 GHz, the incident power density (IPD) is used instead of the specific absorption rate (SAR) for exposure assessment, owing to the shallow penetration depth of millimeter waves. This paper proposes a hybrid field reconstruction framework that integrates classical electromagnetic algorithms with deep learning to evaluate the IPD of wireless communication devices operating at 30 GHz, thereby determining compliance with established RF exposure limits. An initial estimate of the electric field on the evaluation plane is obtained using a classical reconstruction algorithm, followed by refinement through a neural network model that learns the mapping between the initial and accurate values. A multi-antenna dataset, generated via full-wave simulation, is used for training and testing. The impacts of training strategy, initial-value algorithm, reconstruction distance, and measurement sampling density on model performance are analyzed. Results show that the proposed method significantly improves reconstruction accuracy, achieving an average relative error of 4.57% for electric field reconstruction and 2.97% for IPD estimation on the test dataset. Additionally, the effects of practical uncertainty factors, including probe misalignment, inter-probe coupling, and measurement noise, are quantitatively assessed.