Comment on the claim of physical irrelevance of the topological term
Tanmoy Bhattacharya (Los Alamos National Laboratory)

TL;DR
This paper refutes a claim that a topological term in QCD has no physical effects, clarifying that CP violation effects are indeed present and the standard understanding remains valid.
Contribution
It clarifies the misunderstanding regarding the physical relevance of the topological term in QCD and reaffirms the correctness of standard results about CP violation.
Findings
The topological term in QCD can lead to CP violation effects.
The claim of physical irrelevance of the topological term is based on a misunderstanding.
Standard results about CP violation in QCD are correct.
Abstract
We argue that the claim of the absence of charge-conjugation-parity (CP) violating effects due to a topological term in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) is based upon a misunderstanding, and the standard results in the field are correct.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · High-Energy Particle Collisions Research · Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
