LLMs in Interpreting Legal Documents
Simone Corbo

TL;DR
This paper examines the use of Large Language Models in legal document interpretation, highlighting their potential benefits, challenges, and benchmarking efforts in the legal AI domain.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of LLM applications in legal tasks, discusses challenges like hallucinations and regulation compliance, and introduces two benchmarks for evaluation.
Findings
LLMs can improve legal summarisation and contract analysis
Challenges include hallucinations and regulatory compliance
Two benchmarks are proposed for evaluating legal LLMs
Abstract
This chapter explores the application of Large Language Models in the legal domain, showcasing their potential to optimise and augment traditional legal tasks by analysing possible use cases, such as assisting in interpreting statutes, contracts, and case law, enhancing clarity in legal summarisation, contract negotiation, and information retrieval. There are several challenges that can arise from the application of such technologies, such as algorithmic monoculture, hallucinations, and compliance with existing regulations, including the EU's AI Act and recent U.S. initiatives, alongside the emerging approaches in China. Furthermore, two different benchmarks are presented.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Law · Legal Language and Interpretation · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
