Deblending the MIGHTEE-COSMOS survey with XID+: The resolved radio source counts to $S_{1.4}\approx 5\mu$Jy
Eliab D. Malefahlo, Matt J. Jarvis, Mario G. Santos, Catherine Cress, Daniel J.B. Smith, Catherine Hale, Jos\'e Afonso, Imogen H. Whittam, Mattia Vaccari, Ian Heywood, Shuowen Jin, Fangxia An

TL;DR
This paper develops a probabilistic deblending framework using XID+ and multi-wavelength priors to produce accurate radio source catalogs from confused MIGHTEE data, enabling detailed source counts and background resolution.
Contribution
It introduces a high-purity prior strategy combined with masking to improve deblending accuracy and provides a comprehensive catalog and source counts in the MIGHTEE-COSMOS field.
Findings
High-purity priors improve flux recovery accuracy.
The method resolves the radio background down to ~4.8 μJy.
The catalog contains 89,562 sources with reliable flux measurements.
Abstract
Deep radio continuum surveys provide fundamental constraints on galaxy evolution, but source confusion limits sensitivity to the faintest sources. We present a complete framework for producing high-fidelity deblended radio catalogs from the confused MIGHTEE maps using the probabilistic deblending framework XID+ and prior positions from deep multi-wavelength data in the COSMOS field. To assess performance, we construct MIGHTEE-like simulations based on the Tiered Radio Extragalactic Continuum Simulation (T-RECS) radio source population, ensuring a realistic distribution of star-forming galaxies and active galactic nuclei (AGN) for validation. Through these simulations, we show that prior catalog purity is the dominant factor controlling deblending accuracy: a high-purity prior, containing only sources with a high likelihood of radio detection, recovers accurate flux densities and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
