Delving into the depths of NGC 3783 with XRISM IV. Mapping of the accretion flow with Fe K$\alpha$ emission lines
Chen Li, Jelle S. Kaastra, Liyi Gu, Missagh Mehdipour, Megan E. Eckart, Matteo Guainazzi, Erin Kara, Laura W. Brenneman, Misaki Mizumoto, Jon Miller, Keigo Fukumura, Ehud Behar, Christos Panagiotou, Matilde Signorini, Keqin Zhao, Ralf Ballhausen, Camille M. Diez

TL;DR
This study analyzes XRISM spectra of NGC 3783 to characterize Fe Kα emission lines, revealing details about the accretion flow, black hole spin, and the origin of different line components in the AGN.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed modeling of the relativistically broadened Fe Kα line in NGC 3783, constraining the black hole spin and accretion disk geometry using high-resolution XRISM data.
Findings
Resolved narrow Fe Kα components with flux ratio 2:1.
Detected relativistically broadened Fe line indicating a spinning black hole.
Constrained black hole spin to be at least 0.29 at 3σ confidence.
Abstract
Using XRISM/Resolve time-averaged spectra of the well-known Seyfert-1.5 active galactic nucleus (AGN) in NGC 3783, we investigate the nature of the Fe K emission line at 6.4 keV, the strongest and most common X-ray line observed in AGN. Even the narrow component of the line is resolved with evident Fe K (6.404 keV) and K (6.391 keV) contributions in a 2:1 flux ratio, fully consistent with a neutral gas with negligible bulk velocity. The narrow and intermediate-width components have a full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of 350 50 km/s and , respectively, suggesting that they arise in the outer disk/torus and/or BLR. We detect a excess flux around 4 7 keV that is not well described by a symmetric Gaussian line, but is consistent with a relativistically broadened emission line. In this paper, we take…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
