Neutrino mass constraints in the context of 4-parameter dark energy equation of state and DESI DR2 observations

TL;DR

This study explores how flexible four-parameter dark energy models influence neutrino mass constraints using DESI DR2 and other cosmological data, revealing tighter bounds and detailed dark energy evolution.

Contribution

It introduces a four-parameter dark energy equation of state model into neutrino mass analysis, extending beyond common two-parameter models and providing more comprehensive constraints.

Findings

Neutrino mass upper limit is < 0.101 eV at 95% CL with DESI DR2 data.

No significant evidence for phantom crossing at z ~ 0.5.

Reduced chi-squared improvement of -7.3 over ΛCDM model.

Abstract

Cosmological constraints on the total neutrino mass, $\sum m_\nu$, are strongly shaped by assumptions about the dark-energy equation of state due to the well-known degeneracy between massive neutrinos and late-time cosmic acceleration. In this work, we move beyond the two-parameter Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) form adopted in recent DESI analyses and re-examine neutrino mass constraints using a flexible four-parameter dark energy equation of state (4pDE). We implement the 4pDE model in a modified version of CLASS and perform a full MCMC analysis using Planck, DESI DR2 BAO, and Pantheon+ data. Relative to our previous 4pDE study based on pre-DESI BAO datasets, the inclusion of DESI DR2 substantially tightens the constraints on the transition parameters while still yielding a relaxed neutrino-mass bound compared to $\Lambda$CDM, $\sum m_\nu < 0.101$ eV ($95\%$ C.L.). This upper limit is more stringent than the DESI DR2 constraint obtained within the $w_0w_a$CDM framework. From the best-fit parameters, we reconstruct the evolution of the 4pDE equation of state along with both $68\%$ and $95\%$C.L. We do not find a statistically significant phantom-crossing at $z \sim 0.5$, consistent with the conclusion from the DESI collaboration; at higher redshifts, the reconstructed $w(z)$ follows the CPL evolution and deviates only at low redshift. Additionally we also find reduction in $\Delta \chi^2_{\rm min}=-7.3$ compared to $\Lambda$CDM model.