Empowerment Gain and Causal Model Construction: Children and adults are sensitive to controllability and variability in their causal interventions
Eunice Yiu, Kelsey Allen, Shiry Ginosar, and Alison Gopnik

TL;DR
This paper explores how empowerment, an intrinsic reward signal, influences causal learning in humans, especially children, and proposes it as a bridge between Bayesian causal models and reinforcement learning.
Contribution
It introduces an empirical study demonstrating how children and adults use empowerment cues to infer causal relations and design interventions, linking causal learning with empowerment.
Findings
Children and adults use empowerment cues in causal inference.
Empowerment-based interventions improve causal learning.
Empirical evidence supports empowerment as a key factor in causal cognition.
Abstract
Learning about the causal structure of the world is a fundamental problem for human cognition. Causal models and especially causal learning have proved to be difficult for large pretrained models using standard techniques of deep learning. In contrast, cognitive scientists have applied advances in our formal understanding of causation in computer science, particularly within the Causal Bayes Net formalism, to understand human causal learning. In the very different tradition of reinforcement learning, researchers have described an intrinsic reward signal called "empowerment" which maximizes mutual information between actions and their outcomes. "Empowerment" may be an important bridge between classical Bayesian causal learning and reinforcement learning and may help to characterize causal learning in humans and enable it in machines. If an agent learns an accurate causal world model,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
