Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Orthonormal Prototypes
Huanran Li (1), Manh Nguyen (2), Daniel Pimentel-Alarc\'on (3) ((1) Department of Electrical Engineering, (2) Statistics, (3) Biostatistics, Wisconsin Institute of Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison)

TL;DR
This paper introduces CLOP, a semi-supervised contrastive learning method that prevents dimensional collapse by encouraging orthogonal class embeddings, leading to improved stability and performance in image tasks.
Contribution
The paper identifies a critical learning-rate threshold causing collapse and proposes CLOP, a novel loss function promoting orthogonal embeddings to enhance semi-supervised contrastive learning.
Findings
CLOP outperforms standard contrastive methods in classification accuracy.
CLOP demonstrates greater stability across various learning rates and batch sizes.
Experiments confirm CLOP effectively prevents dimensional collapse.
Abstract
Contrastive learning has emerged as a powerful method in deep learning, excelling at learning effective representations through contrasting samples from different distributions. However, dimensional collapse, where embeddings converge into a lower-dimensional space, poses a significant challenge, especially in semi-supervised and self-supervised setups. In this paper, we first identify a critical learning-rate threshold, beyond which standard contrastive losses converge to collapsed solutions. Building on these insights, we propose CLOP, a novel semi-supervised loss function designed to prevent dimensional collapse by promoting the formation of orthogonal linear subspaces among class embeddings. Through extensive experiments on real and synthetic datasets, we demonstrate that CLOP improves performance in image classification and object detection tasks while also exhibiting greater…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
* This paper focuses on an important research area of semi-supervised contrastive learning
* The authors did not follow the standard ICLR style * No theoretical results supporting the success of CLOP * It is unclear when/why CLOP works well
1. Solid Theory – Offers a clear theoretical analysis explaining why InfoNCE leads to dimensional collapse and how orthogonal prototypes can prevent it. 2. Novel Loss Design – Proposes CLOP, a simple yet effective loss that enforces orthogonality among class embeddings to maintain diversity. 3. Strong Empirical Results – Demonstrates consistent gains over baselines like SupCon and SimMatch on CIFAR and ImageNet. 4. Robustness – Performs stably under large learning rates and small batch sizes, av
1. Fixed Prototype Assumption – CLOP assumes a fixed number of well-separated classes and static orthonormal prototypes. How would the method adapt to open-set or hierarchical label scenarios where class structures evolve over time? 2. Limited Scope of Evaluation – All experiments are in vision-based benchmarks (CIFAR, ImageNet). Can CLOP generalize to non-visual domains such as text, graphs, or multimodal tasks, if you don't have time, please disccuss its possibility? 3. Lack of Computational A
1. The method is well performant. 2. The regularizer is modular and could serve as an addendum to other methods. 3. Tackles a known issue of dimensional collapse.
1. The proposed contribution is an incremental one that combines existing notions of orthonormalization with standard contrastive learning without introducing any new theoretical insight. 2. Comparisons against known approaches [1] for this problem aren't conducted. 3. Initialization of prototypes in an orthonormal manner may be misguided since several concepts or classes in datasets may be semantically very related. 4. The theoretical contribution may be a restatement from known work [1].
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Face recognition and analysis · Advanced Neural Network Applications
