An Examination of Bitcoin's Structural Shortcomings as Money: A Synthesis of Economic and Technical Critiques
Hamoon Soleimani

TL;DR
This paper critically evaluates Bitcoin's potential as money, combining economic theory and technical analysis to argue that it functions more as a speculative asset than a stable monetary standard.
Contribution
It synthesizes economic critiques from Post-Keynesian and Austrian perspectives with technical analysis to assess Bitcoin's suitability as money.
Findings
Bitcoin lacks the properties of a stable monetary asset.
It does not meet the criteria of the Regression Theorem.
Bitcoin's volatility and structural issues hinder its use as money.
Abstract
Since its inception, Bitcoin has been positioned as a revolutionary alternative to national currencies, attracting immense public and academic interest. This paper presents a critical evaluation of this claim, suggesting that Bitcoin faces significant structural barriers to qualifying as money. It synthesizes critiques from two distinct schools of economic thought - Post-Keynesianism and the Austrian School - and validates their conclusions with rigorous technical analysis. From a Post-Keynesian perspective, it is argued that Bitcoin does not function as money because it is not a debt-based IOU and fails to exhibit the essential properties required for a stable monetary asset (Vianna, 2021). Concurrently, from an Austrian viewpoint, it is shown to be inconsistent with a strict interpretation of Mises's Regression Theorem, as it lacks prior non-monetary value and has not achieved the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlockchain Technology Applications and Security · Economic theories and models · Economic Theory and Policy
