Relational Visual Similarity
Thao Nguyen, Sicheng Mo, Krishna Kumar Singh, Yilin Wang, Jing Shi, Nicholas Kolkin, Eli Shechtman, Yong Jae Lee, Yuheng Li

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new approach to measure relational similarity between images by focusing on their underlying relational structure rather than surface attributes, filling a critical gap in current visual similarity metrics.
Contribution
The authors formulate relational image similarity as a measurable problem, curate a large dataset of images with relational captions, and fine-tune a Vision-Language model to capture relational logic.
Findings
Existing models fail to capture relational similarity.
A curated dataset of 114k images with relational captions was created.
Fine-tuned model successfully measures relational similarity.
Abstract
Humans do not just see attribute similarity -- we also see relational similarity. An apple is like a peach because both are reddish fruit, but the Earth is also like a peach: its crust, mantle, and core correspond to the peach's skin, flesh, and pit. This ability to perceive and recognize relational similarity, is arguable by cognitive scientist to be what distinguishes humans from other species. Yet, all widely used visual similarity metrics today (e.g., LPIPS, CLIP, DINO) focus solely on perceptual attribute similarity and fail to capture the rich, often surprising relational similarities that humans perceive. How can we go beyond the visible content of an image to capture its relational properties? How can we bring images with the same relational logic closer together in representation space? To answer these questions, we first formulate relational image similarity as a measurable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
