Optical clocks with accuracy validated at the 19th digit
K. J. Arnold, M. D. K. Lee, Zhao Qi, Qichen Qin, Zhang Zhao, N. Jayjong, M. D. Barrett

TL;DR
This paper presents a detailed evaluation of systematic uncertainties in two $^{176}$Lu$^+$ optical clocks, achieving unprecedented accuracy levels validated through direct comparison, demonstrating stability and agreement at the 19th digit.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive uncertainty analysis and direct frequency comparison of $^{176}$Lu$^+$ optical clocks at the 10^-19 level.
Findings
Total systematic uncertainty around 1.1-1.4×10^-19.
Relative frequency agreement within 2.4×10^-19.
Measurement stability of 4.8×10^-16 over time.
Abstract
We report a comprehensive evaluation of all known sources of systematic uncertainty for two independent Lu single-ion optical references, finding total systematic uncertainty of and for the two individual systems and for the difference. Through direct comparison via correlation spectroscopy, we demonstrate a relative frequency agreement of , where `stat' and `sys' indicate the statistical and systematic uncertainty, respectively. The comparison uncertainty is statistically limited after approximately 200 hours of averaging with a measurement instability of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards · Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation · Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
