Control-Oriented System Identification: Classical, Learning, and Physics-Informed Approaches

TL;DR

This paper surveys various approaches to system identification, emphasizing the integration of control-relevant and physics-informed properties to improve model interpretability, guarantees, and sample efficiency in control applications.

Contribution

It introduces a unified optimization framework for incorporating control-relevant properties into system identification and reviews classical, machine learning, and data-driven methods with practical examples.

Findings

Machine learning enables identification from complex data.

Enforcing control properties improves model guarantees.

Survey includes classical, ML, and data-driven methods.

Abstract

We survey classical, machine learning, and data-driven system identification approaches to learn control-relevant and physics-informed models of dynamical systems. Recently, machine learning approaches have enabled system identification from noisy, high-dimensional, and complex data. However, their utility is limited by their ability to provide provable guarantees on control-relevant properties. Meanwhile, control theory has identified several properties that are useful in analysis and control synthesis, such as dissipativity, monotonicity, energy conservation, and symmetry-preserving structures. We posit that merging system identification with such control-relevant or physics-informed properties can provide useful inductive bias, enhance explainability, enable control synthesis with provable guarantees, and improve sample complexity. We formulate system identification as an optimization problem where control-relevant properties can be enforced through direct parameterization (constraining the model structure to satisfy a desired property by construction), soft constraints (encouraging control-relevant properties through regularization or penalty terms), and hard constraints (imposing control-relevant properties as constraints in the optimization problem). Through this lens, we survey methods to learn physics-informed and control-relevant models spanning classical linear and nonlinear system identification, machine learning approaches, and direct identification through data-driven and behavioral representations. We also provide several expository examples that are accompanied by code and brief tutorials on a public Github repository. We also describe challenging directions for future research, including identification in networked, switched, and time-varying systems, experiment design, and bridging the gaps between data-driven, learning-based, and control-oriented approaches.