The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): X-ray stacking analysis of Subaru's optically selected clusters spanning low richness regime
N. T. Nguyen-Dang, N. Ota, N. Okabe, M. Oguri, I. Mitsuishi, T. H. Reiprich, F. Pacaud, E. Bulbul, J. S. Sanders, M. Br\"uggen, A. Liu, Y. Tsujita, I. Chiu, V. Ghirardini, S. Grandis, M. Klein, K. Migkas, H. Miyatake, S. Miyazaki, M. E. Ramos-Ceja

TL;DR
This study investigates the X-ray properties and scaling relations of optically selected galaxy clusters from Subaru HSC using eFEDS data, revealing systematic differences based on X-ray detection and extending analysis to lower mass regimes.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the X-ray scaling relations of optically selected clusters, including their radial profiles and differences between X-ray detected and undetected systems.
Findings
Best-fit L-M slope is 1.56, slightly steeper than self-similar prediction.
N-M slope is 0.766, consistent with theoretical expectations.
X-ray detected clusters have higher central surface brightness and more concentrated profiles.
Abstract
This is the second paper in a series exploring the X-ray properties of galaxy clusters optically selected by the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) survey, using data from the SRG/eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS). We aim to investigate scaling relations between observable cluster properties and mass, and to study the radial X-ray profiles of a large sample of optically selected clusters. We analyze a sample of 997 CAMIRA clusters with richness and redshifts of . Using bolometric luminosities derived from count rates and a weak-lensing mass calibration, we study the and scaling relations through stacking analysis, while accounting for selection effects and redshift evolution. We also compare clusters with and without X-ray counterparts in the eFEDS catalog in terms of their scaling relations and surface brightness profiles. The best-fit …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
