Systematically Evaluating Equivalent Purpose for Digital Maps
Brandon Biggs, David Sloan, Brett Oppegaard, Nicholas A. Giudice, James M. Coughlan, Bruce N. Walker

TL;DR
This paper introduces the MEP Framework, a systematic method for evaluating digital map accessibility for blind and low-vision individuals, ensuring non-visual maps convey equivalent spatial information.
Contribution
It defines measurable criteria for map equivalence under WCAG and evaluates various map representations, highlighting effective approaches.
Findings
Legacy methods like tables and directions fail WCAG criteria.
Audiom Maps, MUD Maps, and Audio Descriptions meet the criteria.
The framework clarifies WCAG's 'equivalent purpose' for maps.
Abstract
Digital geographic maps remain largely inaccessible to blind and low-vision individuals (BLVIs), despite global legislation adopting the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). A critical gap exists in defining "equivalent purpose" for maps under WCAG Success Criterion 1.1.1, which requires that non-text content provide a text alternative that serves the "equivalent purpose". This paper proposes a systematic framework for evaluating map accessibility, called the Map Equivalent-Purpose Framework (MEP Framework), defining purpose through three items (Generalized, Spatial Information, and Spatial Relationships), and establishing 15 measurable criteria for equivalent information communication. Eight text map representations were evaluated against visual map baselines using the proposed MEP Framework. Results show that legacy methods such as tables and turn-by-turn directions fail to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
