EvoIR: Towards All-in-One Image Restoration via Evolutionary Frequency Modulation
Jiaqi Ma, Shengkai Hu, Xu Zhang, Jun Wan, Jiaxing Huang, Lefei Zhang, Salman Khan

TL;DR
EvoIR introduces an adaptive image restoration framework that employs evolutionary frequency modulation to enhance structural fidelity and details across diverse degradations, outperforming existing methods.
Contribution
The paper presents EvoIR, a novel framework combining explicit frequency decomposition with evolutionary optimization for improved all-in-one image restoration.
Findings
EvoIR achieves superior performance on multiple benchmarks.
The method effectively balances structural accuracy and perceptual quality.
EvoIR converges faster than previous approaches.
Abstract
All-in-One Image Restoration (AiOIR) tasks often involve diverse degradation that require robust and versatile strategies. However, most existing approaches typically lack explicit frequency modeling and rely on fixed or heuristic optimization schedules, which limit the generalization across heterogeneous degradation. To address these limitations, we propose EvoIR, an AiOIR-specific framework that introduces evolutionary frequency modulation for dynamic and adaptive image restoration. Specifically, EvoIR employs the Frequency-Modulated Module (FMM) that decomposes features into high- and low-frequency branches in an explicit manner and adaptively modulates them to enhance both structural fidelity and fine-grained details. Central to EvoIR, an Evolutionary Optimization Strategy (EOS) iteratively adjusts frequency-aware objectives through a population-based evolutionary process,…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. The combination of frequency modulation with evolutionary strategy is suitable. Both of them ensure the structural information and fine-grained details. 2. Extensive experiments are conducted in details. The performance under 3D and 5D settings are all good enough with compared params. Its average results are superior than others and especially on deraining and dehazing. 3. Component ablations indicate synergy between FMM and EOS and show faster convergence with EOS.
1. More detailed parameter settings of EOS can be discussed with some additional ablation study, like the training iterations T. 2. Visualization of T-SNE can help readers more to view the effectiveness of EvoIR.
1. The paper addresses the All-in-One Image Restoration (AiOIR) problem, which is a highly significant and practical challenge in computational photography and computer vision. 2. The primary strength of the paper lies in its novel combination of ideas. While frequency-domain processing and dynamic loss weighting are not new individually, integrating a population-based evolutionary search (EOS) to directly optimize the loss weights for a frequency-aware architecture (FMM) is an original approach
1. The claim of novelty for frequency-aware processing should be tempered. Operating in the frequency domain is a common and well-established strategy in image restoration. Recent works like AdaIR (which uses frequency-domain prompts) and other Transformer-based models (e.g., SFHformer) have already successfully leveraged frequency-domain features for image restoration. The FMM module appears to be a well-engineered variant of this existing paradigm rather than a completely new one. 2. The paper
1. The paper recognizes a key limitation in existing all-in-one restoration models that mostly rely on spatial-domain operations. The introduction of frequency-domain decomposition is intuitive and aligns well with the physical properties of image degradations. 2. The proposed EOS provides a novel angle for loss balancing by introducing evolutionary algorithms. This avoids the need for manual tuning of loss weights, which is a practical challenge in multi-degradation learning. 3. EvoIR demonstra
1. While the combination of frequency decomposition and evolutionary optimization is well-engineered, both components are based on existing techniques. The FMM is closely related to frequency gating and hybrid CNN-transformer architectures, while the EOS is a standard evolutionary search mechanism. The overall framework appears to be a modular integration of known methods rather than introducing a fundamentally new paradigm for image restoration. 2. The two main contributions claimed in the intr
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Image Processing Techniques · Image Enhancement Techniques · Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
