Existentially defining valuations in function fields over large fields
Nicolas Daans

TL;DR
This paper proves that in certain function fields over large fields, all valuation rings are existentially definable, leading to the undecidability of their existential theories in the language of rings.
Contribution
It extends previous techniques to show all valuation rings in these function fields are existentially definable, implying undecidability of their existential theories.
Findings
All valuation rings containing $K$ are existentially definable.
The existential theory of the function field $F$ is undecidable.
Extension of techniques from earlier work with Becher and Dittmann.
Abstract
Let be a large field such that is not algebraically closed and a function field in one variable. Extending techniques and results from earlier work with Becher and Dittmann, we show that every valuation ring on containing is existentially definable in the language of rings with parameters from . As a consequence, using a known reduction technique, we obtain the undecidability of the existential theory of in the language of rings with appropriately chosen parameters.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
