Has ACL Lost Its Crown? A Decade-Long Quantitative Analysis of Scale and Impact Across Leading AI Conferences
Jianglin Ma, Ben Yao, Xiang Li, Yazhou Zhang

TL;DR
This study provides a decade-long empirical analysis of leading AI conferences, revealing that conference growth does not equate to impact, and ACL remains a top venue in NLP research based on citation metrics.
Contribution
It introduces a novel bibliometric framework and the QQE metric to empirically evaluate conference impact and growth over ten years.
Findings
Conference expansion does not proportionally increase impact.
QQE declines over time across venues.
ACL continues to outperform other NLP conferences.
Abstract
The recent surge of language models (LMs) has rapidly expanded NLP/AI research, driving an exponential rise in submissions and acceptances at major conferences. Yet this growth has been shadowed by escalating concerns over conference quality, such as plagiarism, reviewer inexperience, and collusive bidding. However, existing studies rely largely on qualitative accounts, for example expert interviews and social media discussions, lacking longitudinal empirical evidence. To fill this gap, we conduct a ten-year empirical study (2014-2024) spanning seven leading conferences. We build a four-dimensional bibliometric framework covering conference scale, core citation statistics, impact dispersion, and cross-venue and journal influence. Notably, we further propose a metric called Quality-Quantity Elasticity (QQE), which measures the elasticity of citation growth relative to acceptance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConferences and Exhibitions Management · Expert finding and Q&A systems · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
